Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Mwah hah hah


Happy Halloween everyone. Two "Syria" links for your entertainment.

Wherein a person on acid would read between the lines to the secret message.

Wherein a person with brains would see the handwriting on the wall.

Sunday, October 14, 2007

Canoodling with the Apocalypse


Timeline, with links and editorial links. Inspired by EW's many timelines.
  • September 26 2001 - Maher Ara, a Canadian citizen, is detained at JFK airport and eventually ends up being tortured at a Syrian prison.
  • October 8, 2002 - Maher Ara delivered to Jordan via CIA transport. Delivery of Ara is with the full expectation that he would be moved to Syria.
  • October 5 2003 - Maher Ara released from Syrian prison.
  • October 5 2003 - Israel bombs Syria in retaliation for suicide bombing.
  • October 15 2003 - Congress suddenly passes the "Syrian Accountability Act". The bill had been stalled by the administration for a "year".
  • July 12, 2006 - 2006 "Lebanon War" begins.
  • August 14, 2006 - 2006 "Lebanon War" ends. More or less. The fact that there is even a serious debate over who "won" decides the issue.
  • August 29-30, 2007 - Nukes mistakenly loaded aboard USAF planes at Minot Air Force Base.
  • September 6, 2007 - Israel bombs location in Northeast Syrian.
  • September 8, 2007 - Turkey requests information from Israel regarding disgarded fuel tanks found on its territory.
  • October 3, 2007 - The Spectator reports that according to a 'senior ministerial source': "If people had known how close we came to world war three that day there’d have been mass panic."
  • November 2, 2007 - Jerusalem Post (citing Al Jazeera?!?) reports USAF planes armed with nukes bombed the Syria location.
[To be updated over the next few days...]

Saturday, April 21, 2007

A Tale of Two Attorney Generals

Only time will tell whether the forced resignation of Arizona US Attorney Paul Charlton was related to the current controversy over US Rep. Rick Renzi. On Thursday Gonzales said the justification for firing Charlton was "poor judgement".

On the other hand, consider the Attorney General for Columbia, Mario Iguaran
. An interview by the Miami Herald is here. And McClatchy reported on Wednesday:

Colombian authorities are pursuing their own investigations into Chiquita's protection payments, and have threatened to seek the extradition of Chiquita executives from the United States. The Colombian attorney general's office also is investigating the Drummond and Coca-Cola cases.

"I do not regard this as a relationship between a blackmailer and his victim," Attorney General Mario Iguaran told journalists. "What I can see is a criminal relationship."

Sometime you go with the Attorney General you have. Not the one you want.


Monday, March 12, 2007

What if... (no patenting this...)


Pizza. Gas. Toilet paper.

Costco. Walmart. Home Depot.

I'm trying to figure out what legal impediments exist with respect to providing stock (corporate ownership) along with each retail store purchase. We already get comp on each credit card purchase. The theory being that stock ownership is SOOOO much more nebulous than - what is it you get with that credit card purchase?

So here is what I'm proposing. Rather than spending your Walmart dollars at - well - Walmart. Shop at "You get shares in the Walmart replacement" and lets see how those shares balloon when that money comes out of the Waltons stake.

Of course, no dice from governments that rely on the lottery. Because... hey!... the market is gambling. And we can't have that!

Trust me... if this was a legal business model, things would be different quickly.

Tuesday, October 24, 2006

Crucified Again



From Real Time with Bill Maher (September 22, 2006) [my emphasis]:
WHITFORD: By the way, the root of this controversy is the incredibly radical assertion that maybe Jesus was anti-war. [laughter]

RIOS: Well, maybe he
was.

MAHER: And you have to wonder—

RIOS: He’s coming as a –
he’s coming for the last battle as – he’s coming as a warrior on a horse. That’s what the scriptures say. So I guess he’s not totally against battle.

WHITFORD: But, hang on.

RIOS: Yes.

WHITFORD: If the scripture says it, is it so?

RIOS: I believe it is.

RIOS is Sandy Rios. References to her wingnut credentials here, here and here.

Rios is a "cultural warrior campaigner" of a particular
wingnuttia strain. The bring-on-Armageddon-so-I-can-enjoy-some-schauenfreude strain. Rios and her ilk are heirs of the Darby eschatology - richly illustrated by Charles Larkin bewtwen 1914 and 1919. That end time scenario has played a small but not insignificant role in the US-Israel relationship during the 20th and 21st century.

[to be continued]

Saturday, July 22, 2006

The Prize

On November 17th, 2005, neocon whackjob Laurent Murawiec - famous for his PowerPoint presentation containing the enigmatic noodle-scratcher "Egypt the prize" - participated in a discussion of one of his books.

Also paritipating in the discussion was our friend Richard Perle, the real Prince of Darkness.

Little Dick said:
They missed it in part, I believe, because the Saudi regime as been extraordinarily skillful – a skill much assisted by large quantities of money. In fact, if the money is sufficient, you probably don’t have to be all that skillful. It has skillfully created an image and impression of Saudi Arabia in part by buying or at least renting virtually every U.S. government specialist on the subject of the nature of the Saudi regime as they have left government service. And not only that, they’ve made it perfectly apparent to the people in government service, who deal with Saudi Arabia and indeed often with the rich – they have made it apparent to them that when they leave government service, there will be opportunities for them. It’s corrupt. It’s a suborning of American officialdom. And I think if we were to compile a list of the several hundred Americans who have served in Saudi Arabia in various capacities, have been employed by the U.S. government to advise us on how we should think about the Saudis, how we should understand the nature of the relationship between us, I believe you would find that a very high percentage of them earn their living from a continuing relationship with Saudi institutions after they have left government. This needs to be investigated and investigated thoroughly. I wish Patrick Fitzgerald, if he goes on to another intensive investigation, will focus on something like that, which is of immense importance.
Two points. Fitz already has his hands full with a counter-espionage case, and... Dick, leave the comedy to the pros.

ClueLess

In the April 21 Motions Hearing of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. STEVEN J. ROSEN, KEITH WEISSMAN there is this interesting exchange between Lowell, who is representing Rosen and Weissman, and the Honorable T.S. Ellis, III:
ATTORNEY LOWELL: If they pass it on, when the government says they should have known it was national defense, whether they got it from Larry Franklin or U.S. Government Official 1, U.S. Government Official 2, James Risen of the New York Times, Walter Pincus of the Washington Post, if they get that and they pass it on --

THE COURT: Are these people whose names I should know?

ATTORNEY LOWELL: Well, one of them got the Pulitzer Prize this week for doing what my client has been indicted for. And the other one is in the audience, so I thought I would use his name.

THE COURT: I've never heard of either of them, and they've never heard of me, and I hope it continues that way.
Pincus must have been sleeping. Or had his fingers in his ears. It was pretty brave of Lowell to assume he was referring just to "Pincus" and "Risen".

Saturday, February 11, 2006

Cumbersome


From Fitzgerald affidavit:
"(Because it is far easier for
the parties and the court to deal with declassified materials than to deal with classified information, we will be seeking a classification review wherever appropriate, though those reviews can be cumbersome.)"
In Fitzgerald letter to Jeffers, Wells and Tate:
We also note that it is our understanding that Mr. Libby testified that he was authorized to disclose information about the NIE to the press by his superiors.
Leaving aside for the moment the odd clause "it is our understanding", it certainly sounds as though Libby and his superiors didn't find the selective declassification of portions of the NIE all that cumbersome. Was Fitz being snarky in his parenthetical aside?